How Non-Tariff Barriers Quietly Undermine U.S. Manufacturers in Global Markets

Country & Market News Manufacturing International News

By Staff Writer Manufacturing International

Introduction

A. Context

Why This Conversation Matters Now – While tariffs dominate headlines, it’s non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that are quietly causing long-term damage to U.S. manufacturing competitiveness. As we enter a new era of global trade where overt protectionism becomes politically risky, many nations are weaponizing regulatory frameworks, standards, and certifications to control market access. For U.S. manufacturers, especially small and mid-sized firms, these unseen hurdles can be just as costly – if not more so – than traditional tariffs. This is of core importance to our readers and core importance to Manufacturing International

The 2025 National Trade Estimate Report from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) highlights a surge in NTBs globally, from documentation bottlenecks to technical regulations designed to block imports. This article will examine how these barriers function, where they hurt the most, and why the latest tariff pause from the Trump administration is not a reprieve—but a redirection.

I. Understanding Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs)

Definition: Non-tariff barriers are trade restrictions that take the form of regulations, licensing requirements, product standards, local content rules, and customs procedures—as opposed to taxes or tariffs on imports.

Examples of Non-Tariff Barriers – NTBs:

Product safety standards that vary by country
Documentation requirements at customs
Local content laws mandating domestic sourcing
Pre-shipment inspections
Packaging and labeling standards

These regulations often appear innocuous—or even consumer-friendly—but they create substantial compliance burdens, particularly for firms unfamiliar with foreign systems.

II. How NTBs Impact U.S. Manufacturers

Small and mid-sized manufacturers are the most exposed. Large firms often have legal departments or consultants to manage compliance. For everyone else, NTBs can:

Delay time-to-market by months
Add unexpected costs from rejected shipments
Require costly product redesigns
Result in missed contract deadlines

Real-World Non-Tariff Barrier Challenges:

CE Marking in the EU: Even for simple machinery, manufacturers must meet EU conformity requirements that include specific documentation, translations, and third-party testing.
REACH Compliance: U.S. chemical manufacturers face expensive and bureaucratic hurdles under the EU’s REACH chemical registration framework.
India & Brazil: Both require in-country testing for telecom and electronic equipment, even when equivalent U.S. certifications already exist.

III. The NTB vs. Tariff Dynamic

Comparison Grid: Tariffs vs. Non-Tariff Barriers

Feature	Tariffs	Non-Tariff Barriers
Visibility	Highly visible, politically sensitive	Often hidden, bureaucratic
Measurability	Easily quantifiable	Difficult to measure impact
Negotiability	Often negotiated in trade talks	Rarely discussed or dismantled
Compliance Cost	Simple to account for	Complex, ongoing compliance cost
Enforcement	Collected at border	Enforced through inspections and paperwork

Non-tariff barriers are not just regulatory preferences—they’re often strategic tools to shield domestic markets under the guise of consumer safety or environmental protection.

Key NTBs in the EU and China

The 2025 National Trade Estimate Report highlights specific NTBs affecting U.S. manufacturers in the EU and China. Below is a table summarizing these barriers:

Region	NTB Type	Details	Impact on U.S. Manufacturers	Relevant Numbers
EU	Agricultural Biotechnology	Delays in GE product approvals, 0.1% limit for unapproved biotech traits	Limits U.S. agricultural exports	29 applications under EFSA review, 6 await EC action
EU	Government Procurement	Hungary favors local/non-EU suppliers, 50% EU content requirement	Reduces U.S. access to procurement markets	50% EU content requirement
EU	Certification Requirements	Frequent changes in health certificates for animal products	Increases compliance costs	14 certificate versions since 2022
China	Government Procurement	Not acceded to WTO GPA, 20% price deduction for domestic products	Excludes U.S. firms from public contracts	20% price deduction
China	Standards, Testing, Certification	China Compulsory Certification (CCC) system requires extensive testing	Increases costs and delays	Applies to numerous products
China	Digital Trade Barriers	Restrictions on cross-border data flows, data localization	Hinders U.S. tech companies	–

EU Barriers

In the EU, NTBs like strict biotechnology regulations delay U.S. agricultural exports, while procurement practices in countries like Hungary favor local firms, limiting U.S. access to public contracts. Frequent changes in certification requirements further complicate trade, as noted in the St. Louis Fed analysis.

China Barriers

China’s NTBs, such as the CCC system and procurement biases, create significant hurdles for U.S. manufacturers. Digital trade barriers, including data localization, particularly affect tech firms, as detailed in the 2025 NTE Report.

NTBs and the 90-Day Trade Negotiations

The U.S. is currently engaged in trade negotiations with over 75 countries during a 90-day tariff pause announced on April 9, 2025, as reported by Reuters. This pause, excluding China, aims to negotiate new trade deals to address unfair practices, including NTBs, as outlined in the 2025 NTE Report.

EU Negotiations

The EU has suspended countermeasures for 90 days, creating a window to address NTBs like biotechnology delays and procurement biases, according to CNBC. Success could ease trade challenges for U.S. manufacturers.

China’s Exclusion

China faces 145% tariffs and is not part of these negotiations, as noted by The Washington Post. This could lead to retaliatory NTBs, further complicating U.S. market access.

Wait-and-See Approach

Given the complexity of these talks, a wait-and-see approach is prudent. We’ll update this post once negotiation outcomes are clear, as they could significantly impact NTBs and U.S. trade strategies.

Recommended Reading:

IV. NTBs Were Part of the Trump Trade Playbook from the Start

Although best known for his tariff-first approach, President Trump and USTR Robert Lighthizer consistently raised NTBs during bilateral trade talks.

According to the 2020 USTR Report, China, the EU, and India were flagged for extensive NTB use, including forced tech transfers, conformity assessment delays, and localized data rules.

This trend has only intensified. The 2025 NTE outlines a new surge in NTBs tied to green compliance rules, labor protections, and digital sovereignty.

Conclusion from Manufacturing International: The Quiet Storm of Non-Tariff Barriers

While media attention continues to focus on tariffs and high-profile trade negotiations, non-tariff barriers are doing just as much—if not more—to shape global manufacturing. These barriers often target the very sectors the U.S. is trying to grow.

For U.S. manufacturers to thrive:

They must understand the NTB landscape
Develop compliance strategies
And push for stronger federal action in trade agreements

If not, the “pause” in tariffs may be a prelude to a longer, costlier era of regulatory obstruction.

Stay informed. Stay competitive. Subscribe to Manufacturing International for more original analysis, expert tools, and global manufacturing insights.

Sources:

(Disclaimer: All tariff rates, trade statistics, and policy references are based on publicly available information as of the latest updates. Readers should consult official databases or professional advisors for the most current details.)